Yep, you read that header right — Advertising Age recommends NOT ADVERTISING. A recent editorial in Ad Age shared HMOs (hot marketing opinions) about JetBlue’s current advertising campaign. The gist is this …
“JetBlue is missing the point with its recent ad push. What it needs is to get back to what made it a media and consumer darling: customer service and good internal and external communication.”“… convincing more people to fly doesn't seem like a smart move for an airline that has trouble handling the passengers it already has. It won't fool new passengers, and it will only upset current passengers. JetBlue achieved its success by being unlike the other airlines. Its good name spread -- via word-of-mouth and smart marketing -- because great customer service gave it a compelling story to tell.”
“Priority No. 1 should be getting back to a place where consumers want to share good stories. Take the money being wasted on that campaign and plow it into customer service.”
Let’s take this a step further. BEFORE any company spends gobs of money on an advertising campaign, it should first spend money on improving the performance of a product/service and on ratcheting up the customer experience. ‘Nuff said! Errrahh!
Haha. John, I get the feeling you got a certain sense of satisfaction from that blog post?
Posted by: Neal Stewart | June 08, 2008 at 07:41 PM
There could also be a problem with that approach. Which is that companies spend so long making sure their product is perfect before that launch, that they run out of money before anyone can really buy it. It used to be common in the computer games industry.
Posted by: Richard Millington | June 08, 2008 at 08:23 PM
Great article. Yes far too many businesses still seem to wait until sales are down and then start throwing money at marketing to try and sort the problem.
Which understandably has a limited chance of working as the core reason that is causing sales to slide has not been addressed.
Time spent re-visiting strategy, reviewing and adjusting the product offer should always come ahead of new marketing campaigns.
Posted by: John Jackson | June 09, 2008 at 06:24 AM
I have not seen the spots but can tell you that I'm a loyal brand ambassador to JetBlue. I freakin love them!
I have NEVER been on a JetBlue flight where the experience wasn't far superior to any other airline. Remember a company can never be perfect and shit happens. JetBlue has done a masterful job at resolving the big issues with their Bill of Rights.
I'm a branding guy, not an ad guy. I hardly ever promoto TV because in general I think it's a waste but...
In this case NOW is the time to advertise. All the other airlines (except Southwest) are porking the customers. It's a great opportunity to stand out when times are tough.
I believe that JetBlue is still providing great service compared to its competitors (which is pretty easy since they don't care about service). Therfore take advantage of them and kick them when their down is what I say.
The cavet is that JetBlue must remain consistent on their service. Go JetBlue!
p.s. I have a fear or should I say anxiety of flying. I don't like to fly, period. So for me to say I love an airline is pretty big.
Posted by: BIG Kahuna | June 09, 2008 at 10:02 AM
Neal ... yeah, the irony here is delicious.
Richard ... my point on spending marketing $$$ on making the product/service better isn't to wait until its 100% perfect. It's about being confident in the product/service before spending gobs of marketing $$$ advertising it.
Scott ... this JetBlue ad campaign is more a brand message than anything else. They are promoting "Jetting" and not "flying." As the Ad Age editorial says, the JetBlue business was built on delivering a better customer experience ... one that is worthy of talking about. Major media advertising campaigns were not part of the marketing mix at JetBlue. By delivering a better experience, people talked about it. As a marketer, I would rather have people talking about the products/services my company does and not the advertising it did.
Posted by: john moore (from Brand Autopsy) | June 09, 2008 at 11:19 AM
Someone smart once said, "Advertising is for companies that lack originality." or something close to that at least.
Good service or products spread through the most valuable of channel, the relationship channel. Value added, messages through word of mouth or mouse from trusted sources are the MAIN reason i buy or click .
It's also the main reason I know about Jet Blue. Keep talking to people Jet Blue, its a hell of a lot better than advertising.
Posted by: Jess | June 09, 2008 at 03:58 PM
John: It's a sad state of affairs that we're even blogging about this. I remember being 16 and working at a local greasy spoon. The owner was always trying to get more people in the door, but couldn't efficiently deliver quality to the few people who did come in. Then, when a little festival brought hundreds of people into the diner that had never been there before, he succeeded only in turning hundreds of new people off, despite the week or more he spent readying himself, his diner and his staff.
I could speak of his problems in terms of positioning and strategy, but why bother. I was 16 and could see that his first mistake was not offering his existing customers something to talk about.
That greasy spoon is now a multi-national chain with 430 units in 4 countries... just kidding. (but isn't that how a lot of these stories turn out?)
Posted by: dave from wudifwe.com | June 09, 2008 at 09:46 PM
Another POV
http://whatsnext.typepad.com/whats_next_in_marketing/2008/05/jetblue-and-sho.html
Posted by: M Caplan | June 10, 2008 at 01:11 PM
John,
As a business/marketing/communications consultant, I haven't recommended advertising as part of a client's marketing mix in the last 10 years. There just are better ways to get noticed and to spend our marketing dollars. Of course, there are always exceptions to this and there are industries (e.g., retail) in which advertising remains a key tool in the marketing mix.
Posted by: Lewis Green | June 11, 2008 at 01:51 PM
I think the key to effective advertising is to avoid the media channels that are thick with competition.
What is the sense in advertising in the yellow pages or martindale when there are hundreds of your competitors listed there too?
I have heard many attorney having good success with some of the niche market companies.
For example if your niche is probate and estate settlement work. Then you may wish to look into http://www.EstateSettlement.com
They are the only guys that I know of that just allow one probate attorney listing per community or county. Heck they seem to rate just as high under keyword like: "find a probate attorney".
Posted by: Brian | June 12, 2008 at 10:48 PM
I completely agree. I'd much rather be treated perfectly by a company I've never heard of than poorly by somebody that's just a good talker.
Posted by: Bill | June 12, 2008 at 11:08 PM
John - when will companies be happy with 100% referral business?
Posted by: John Jantsch | June 13, 2008 at 11:01 AM
I completely. I used to fly JetBlue alot even when the tickets where my more exensive than my old favorite AA. Unfortunately, I am back to kayaking to find the best deals. Also, insight on far ahead JetBlue has it's oil prices hedged?
Posted by: Pat | June 13, 2008 at 02:22 PM
For the past 20 years, GM has been the biggest television advertiser in the world, and for each of those years, GM has lost market share. Perhaps they should have been spending more of that money on product and less on lying. Not that I'm against all advertising. It just isn't the right solution to many, many problems. We're now in the post-advertising age, where brands that tell the best stories win. Brands that advertise generally annoy.
Posted by: Jeremy Greenfield | June 13, 2008 at 05:03 PM
I don't think the Ad Age editorial is about advertising. I think it's about focusing on the consumer experience and on being transparent--two must-haves for the social media age. I am more concerned with how JetBlue is misusing Twitter than I am with their advertising. My two cents at:
http://www.experiencetheblog.com/2008/06/did-ad-age-just-suggest-jetblue-not.html
Posted by: Augie Ray | June 16, 2008 at 12:02 PM
..but how long would it take to get popular? Advertising gives instant (short term) success, so is useful in that matter.
Posted by: Giles Dawe | March 18, 2009 at 03:24 AM