My Photo

Solving Starbucks Problems

SUBSCRIBE OPTIONS

Archives



  • SEARCH the Brand Autopsy archive:

Blogroll


Popular Posts

May 05, 2008

New Guru Review

Four years ago I linked to an article titled, GURU NATION. The article shed light on the Business Guru Scene from the egos to the economics of it all. Interesting read.

The Wall Street Journal has revisited the Guru Scene for 2008. This updated look reflects a change where more non-traditional business experts are in greater demand. Journalists like Thomas Friedman (#2) and Malcolm Gladwell (#4) rank high as does education professor, Howard Gardner (#5). According to the article, the most popular topics for these business gurus include: globalization, motivation ,and innovation. Here's the list...

Gururankings_2

This list was compiled by two Babson College professors and is based upon the number of online mentions, academic citations, and LexisNexis media mentions. It’s not a truly scientific list, but it is an interesting list.

Adding to the interest is the absence of women in the top 20 rankings. Wendy Bounds, from the Wall Street Journal, asked readers for their take on why women are absent from the list … the conversation is worth reading.

March 19, 2008

Knowledge Nuggets from Steve Jobs

The March 17th issue of Fortune magazine has a "Good Steve | Bad Steve" take on Steve Jobs. The Good Steve article has chewy knowledge nuggets from him on being innovative, connecting with consumers, staying focused, managing people, and hiring talented people. Good stuff.

on being innovative…
"You can't ask people what they want if it's around the next corner," says Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO and cofounder. At Apple, new-product development starts in the gut and gets hatched in rolling conversations that go something like this: What do we hate? (Our cellphones.) What do we have the technology to make? (A cellphone with a Mac inside.) What would we like to own? (You guessed it, an iPhone.) "One of the keys to Apple is that we build products that really turn us on," says Jobs.


on connecting with consumers…
"It's not about pop culture, and it's not about fooling people, and it's not about convincing people that they want something they don't. We figure out what we want. And I think we're pretty good at having the right discipline to think through whether a lot of other people are going to want it, too. That's what we get paid to do.” [MORE]
on staying focused…
”People think focus means saying yes to the thing you’ve go to focus on. But that’s not what it means at all. It means saying no to the 100 other good ideas that there are. You have to pick carefully.” [MORE]
on managing people…
“We've got 25,000 people at Apple. About 10,000 of them are in the stores. And my job is to work with sort of the top 100 people, that's what I do. So when a good idea comes … part of my job is to move it around, just see what different people think, get people talking about it, argue with people about it, get ideas moving among that group of 100 people.” [MORE]
on hiring talented people…
"When I hire somebody really senior, competence is the ante. They have to be really smart. But the real issue for me is, Are they going to fall in love with Apple? Because if they fall in love with Apple, everything else will take care of itself. They'll want to do what's best for Apple, not what's best for them.” [MORE]

March 12, 2008

Borders Reducing its Borders

Borders_frontfacing_2

Bookstores merchandise most books with the spine facing out. Only new releases and best-sellers get the front-face treatment. Merchandising books with the spine facing out allows the retailer to stock more books. However, front-facing books gives a book greater visibility and results in higher sales.

Borders recently tested a front-facing display strategy where more books were stocked with their covers, not spines, facing customers. Sales increased by 9.0%. The strategy was so successful, all Borders bookstores will be switching to the front-facing strategy in the next couple of weeks.

The drawback to a front-facing strategy is Borders will have to reduce its inventory by 5%-10%. This means the typical Borders store will reduce its inventory anywhere from 4,700 books to 9,300 books. Execs at Borders aren’t too concerned about the loss of inventory since many of the books they stock only sell one copy per year.

On the other hand, Barnes & Noble has no intentions of reducing its inventory of books. (The typical Barnes & Noble stocks 125,000 to 150,000 at its stores.)

Borders did some customer research at its front-facing prototype store and learned customers perceived Borders as having more books, not fewer, with this new display strategy. (Interesting.)

Bold move by Borders. We’ll have to see if this works in the short-term AND the long-term.

FOR MORE: Read this Wall Street Journal article.


FOR EVEN MORE: Seth Godin riffs on how Borders strategy is counter to the Long Tail. Joe Wikert, an executive at book publisher Wiley, fears customers will leave empty-handed because of the reduced inventory.

February 27, 2008

Starbucks should do more of this…

No I’m not talking about the re-training of its front-line employees on how to make the perfect coffee drink. I am talking about a video ditty I spied on YouTube. It’s a two-minute documentary of Young Han, a Starbucks barista, talking about his “Got Milk” photo shoot and his appreciation for the Starbucks Coffee Company.

It works great as a recruitment video. Not slick. Not scripted. Just genuine moments and reflections. Have a look…

RSS readers ... click here to watch the video

As we’ve discussed, Starbucks is doing very little to tap into the Third Space communities people are forming online. (Big miss in my book.)

While Howard Schultz may never blog, Starbucks should STRONGLY CONSIDER encouraging its young and talented workforce to post videos of why they feel a connection to Starbucks. They could turn it into a contest similar to Deloitte & Touche’s brilliant Film Fest idea where Starbucks baristas would submit short videos showcasing “What Starbucks Means to Me.” The best 10 videos would be posted on the barren Starbucks YouTube page for all to see.

Each of these top 10 videos would serve as a great recruitment tool for Starbucks. And the creators of these videos could be rewarded in some way, perhaps stock options. A simple idea to execute with potentially big results of attracting a better front-line employee to deliver better customer experiences.

(This is yet another in a series of free ideas from Brand Autopsy and the readers of this blog that Starbucks would be smart to use.)

February 05, 2008

Howard Schultz Must Blog

As we know, Howard Schultz has returned as CEO at Starbucks.  He’s committed to fixing the “unintended consequences” caused by growing its store footprint at a rapid pace.  Such unintended consequences have included losing the company’s identity and the dilution of the unique customer experience Starbucks once delivered.  Howard has also pledged to refocus the company on growing its relationships with customers.

Writing in the Huffington Post, Jesse Kornbluth raises a valid point,

“It's interesting that Schultz professes to love Starbucks customers but has no apparent interest in hearing from us. How's that, Howard? You're going to thrill us without getting our input? Do you really think focus groups, consumer research and executive offsites will tell you what you need to know? What, exactly, do you think the Starbucks website is for?”

Jesse is onto something when he writes, “Schultz professes to love Starbucks customers but has no apparent interest in hearing from us.”

As evidence by their lack of participation, we know Starbucks, as a company, has refused to blog and refuses to participate in online conversations.  The Starbucks Gossip blog is all the proof the company needs to know that people want Starbucks to join the online conversation.  Yet, the company refuses to have a conversation with its customers (and employees) online.

Clearly, Starbucks was ahead of the curve with tapping into satisfying the consumer need of a Third Place—a place besides home and work where people could form community.  But consumers have evolved from needing a Third Place to needing a Third Space.  This Third Space includes social media spaces like blogs, vlogs, podcasts, Twitter, and many more. These are spaces where meaningful online communities are forming.

Now that the company recognizes it needs to improve its relationships with customers to improve the health of its business, maybe Starbucks will consider blogging.

Better yet, given Howard Schultz’s pledge to growing the company's relationships with customers, he should blog.  He should give us, the 50+ million Starbucks customers who visit his stores weekly, updates on how his company is making the necessarily changes to follow his vision for reclaiming the Starbucks luster. 

Howard recently told Wall Street analysts that, since returning as CEO, he has received thousands of emails from customers and employees who share his enthusiasm for reigniting the emotional attachment people have with the Starbucks brand.  With a blog, just imagine how many more messages Howard would receive from adoring customers and employees who want to see the company succeed.

Howard has always talked about growing his company to get bigger by acting smaller.  And a blog, or some other social media avenue, is the perfect tool to help big companies get smaller in customer’s eyes.  Other CEO blogs like Jonathan Schwartz’s blog and Bob Lutz’s blog have helped to make Sun Microsystems and General Motors, both goliath companies, get smaller in the eyes of customers.  And thanks to encouraging its employees to blog, companies like Microsoft look less pervasive and less evil in the eyes of customers. 

Can you imagine the conversations that would occur if Howard Schultz used the Starbucks website to regularly share updates on how his company is bringing back the old Starbucks juju?  I’m sure many of the Starbucks faithful would be thrilled to read impassioned updates from Howard.  I'm also sure Howard would receive pointed feedback (and yes, un-pointed feedback too) on activities the company should stop doing, start doing, and/or continue doing.

Unfortunately, the Starbucks corporate culture doesn’t sync with social media.  My experience of working deep inside the company tells me Starbucks is extremely careful in how they are portrayed in the traditional media.  They want to be in control of the conversation in the media as much as possible.  Since Starbucks is cautious about how traditional media portrays the company, then no way will Starbucks be comfortable playing in the non-traditional untamed waters of social media.  Do I think this is right?  Absolutely not!

Starbucks helped to popularize the “New Marketing” ethos of spending marketing dollars on making better customer experiences and not on making extravagant advertising campaigns.  In essence, Starbucks baked marketing inside its business.  It didn’t have to advertise because everything about the in-store Starbucks experience was the advertising.

Starbucks still operates under this “New Marketing” ethos but the game has evolved dramatically.  A “NOW MARKETING” movement has emerged and Starbucks hasn’t kept up.  This “NOW MARKETING” ethos is the realization of the prophetic Cluetrain Manifesto where the Internet has changed how customers expect to interact with businesses.  As the Cluetrain writers explain:

"A powerful global conversation has begun. Through the Internet, people are discovering and inventing new ways to share relevant knowledge with blinding speed. As a direct result, markets are getting smarter—and getting smarter faster than most companies."

In growing its business, Starbucks has always operated under the guidance of “Be everywhere its customers expect them to be.”  This is the rationale for why the company began serving its coffee on United Airlines, expanding Internationally, operating licensed concept locations in airports, selling cold bottled coffee in convenience stores, selling whole bean coffee in grocery stores, etc.

Customers today have a new expectation. 

Customers now expect Starbucks, and other businesses, to engage in conversations with them wherever and whenever.  Be it in the Third Place or the Third Space, customers want to interact with businesses they love.  By being active in the Third Space online, companies show their love for customers by being open to having a conversation with them. 

If Howard Schultz really loves his 50+million weekly customers, he would show it by evolving his company’s culture to adopt the “NOW MARKETING” movement.  If Howard Schultz really loves Starbucks customers, he must blog.  He must carry on a conversation with us.


UPDATE:  This blog post has been simmering within me for a few weeks.  After hitting the publish button, I ventured over to the Starbucks.com site and hidden in the bottom right-hand corner is a "Howard Schultz Partner Update" link.  This particular update is titled. "What I Know to Be True."  Interesting.  Seems like Howard is using the company website to share his impassioned updates with customers and employees.

Also posted are are transcripts of voicemails to stores regarding the work ahead of the company. 

Of course, it would be better if Starbucks were to open up the conversation, allow comments from readers, and commit to making this an on-going feature.  That way, Starbucks would be embracing the "NOW MARKETING" movement we have come to expect from businesses we adore.

February 01, 2008

The Makings of a Strong Brand

Brand-building is an exercise we businesspeople get excited about. I’m very much devoted to helping businesses build their brand. But in doing so, I focus less on implementing "Branding Strategies" for businesses and instead, focus more on amplifying Being Strategies of businesses.

I truly believe that you cannot create a brand before you create a business—the process is simultaneous. As you build your business, you create your brand. Your brand never makes your business possible. It’s your business that makes your brand possible.

When I talk with businesses wanting to improve their branding, I ask them three questions:

a | How do you make a profit?
b | How do you make employees happy?
c | How do you make customers happy?

I ask these questions because a funny thing happens when a company (a) makes money, (b) makes employees happy, and (c) makes customers happy … it makes a strong brand. Being Strategies for a company find avenues to making a profit, enchanting employees, and pleasing customers. The result being, a strong brand.

Is it simple? Yeah, I think so.

Name a company that (a) fails to make money, (b) fails to make employees happy, and (c) fails to make customers happy … yet, is recognized as an endearing and enduring brand.

Comments are open, so go ahead and debunk this assertion.

January 31, 2008

Ideaicide Prevention is Everybody’s Business

Ideacide
"Ideas are usually rejected out of turn for being too 'something' — too fast, too unproven, too far beyond the corporate image. 'Too something' is a reactionary description used to take the edge off ideas that are strong, bold, and a little scary at first sight. Your challenge is to help people discover a means, harmonious with the culture, to accept your concept."
Alan Parr & Karen Ansbaugh
Ideaicide: How To Avoid It And Get What You Want
* ChangeThis Manifesto *

Be smarter. Be better. Read this.


Ideaicide

January 29, 2008

The Pirate’s Dilemma | REMIXED

“Remixing is about taking something that already exists and redefining it in your own personal creative space, reinterpreting someone else’s work your way. [It’s about] taking an idea and making it suitable for a whole new audience.”Matt Mason, THE PIRATE’S DILEMMA

Consider the following post a remix of Matt Mason’s THE PIRATE’S DILEMMA. The twist I’m adding is whittling down the gist of Matt’s message into a WHATSO WHATWHAT NOW structure. The WHAT is the core of Matt’s idea. The SO WHAT explains why the WHAT matters. And the WHAT NOW is advice on how to action upon the WHAT.

NOTE: All direct samples lifted from Mason’s original work, THE PIRATE’S DILEMMA, are quoted in italics.


Piratesdilemma_remixed_3

WHAT:
“Entrepreneurs look for gaps in the market. Pirates look for gaps outside of the market. By thinking like pirates, people grow niche audiences to a critical mass and change the mainstream from the bottom-up.”


SO WHAT:
Matt Mason reasons today’s capitalism is influenced by Pirate entrepreneurs who are rocking the boat by “doing things differently and working out new ways to share information, intellectual property, and public space.”

American Apparel
is a company run by a Pirate entrepreneur in Don Charney. Influenced by the punk capitalism ideal of “putting purpose next to profit,” Charney is reinventing the apparel industry in America. All of American Apparel clothes are produced in a sweatshop-free factory in downtown Los Angeles. American Apparel factory workers earn an average of $13/hr, plus they receive benefits like subsidized lunches, bus passes, free bicycles, and health insurance. 20% of the cotton used by American Apparel is organic, 20% of the power used at their factory comes from their rooftop solar panels, and all fabric scraps are recycled. By selling both substance and style, Charney is making a healthy profit and upending the market in the process.

Tomoaki Nagao is a Pirate entrepreneur impacting the sneaker trade. Nagao remixed Nike’s Air Force One basketball shoe in garish colors and high-gloss patent leather. The result of this remixed shoe is the sought-after and super-expensive BapeSta shoe line (known as Bapes). Thanks to the success of Bapes, Nike has reintroduced the Air Force One shoe in similar garish colors. Not a surprising move for Nike given that its co-founder and leader, Phil Knight, is an O.P. (Original Pirate) having rocked the sneaker trade in the early 70s.

“Finding a space to get your idea across is as important as having the idea itself. If the idea is good, growing an audience won’t be difficult. It’s the audience that gives pirates their power.” Shawn Fanning’s Pirate prowess was boosted when his idea went viral. At one point, 70-million people were freely sharing MP3s using Fanning’s ultimate pirate creation—Napster.

The entire music industry business model has been rocked by Napster and other peer-to-peer music sharing programs. However, “as quickly as society figures out new ways to share ideas that advance the common good, private interests move in to stop this from happening, to maintain the old systems that benefit only the elite.” The music industry levied a litany of legal charges against Napster, forcing this Pirate business to reform its rock-the-boat ways and go from a free service to a paid service.

The music industry is still waging legal battles against free download sites. But the irrevocable damage has been down. Pirates have forever changed how people view the accessibility, portability, and usability of music. The music industry is facing the “PIRATE’S DILEMMA” of how to respond when an outside force finds new ways to “share information, intellectual property, and public space” that bypasses the capitalistic models of the old guard.


WHAT NOW:
Responding to the PIRATE’S DILEMMA is a dilemma for companies competing a marketplace that has been rocked by Pirate entrepreneurs. Do you steadfastly cling to how you’ve always done business and choose not to compete in the Pirate-created market? Or do you compete with the Pirates in the market they’ve rocked?

In Matt Mason’s words, do you “fight these pirates, or accept that there is some value in what they are doing, and compete with them?” That’s the dilemma facing businesses in all types of industries.

Mason believes “resistance if futile” and if you choose to ignore the Pirate-created market or choose not to adapt to the changing marketplace … you will lose. The solution to THE PIRATE’S DILEMMA, according to Mason, is to act like a Pirate by “recognizing the pirate within” and to view disrupted markets not as problems, but as opportunities.


Further Mixes:
>> THE PIRATE’S DILEMMA | website and blog
>> THE PIRATE’S DILEMMA | review
>> Matt Mason presentation| video
>> Matt Mason presentation | slides

January 25, 2008

Bad Apple?

Fascinating post from Jens Alfke, a just-resigned Apple employee — read it here. (Thanks to Steve Chazin for the hook-up.)

In this post
, Jens reveals his dissatisfaction with Apple’s reluctance to embrace the open source/social software culture. Other "creative differences" causing this 16-year Apple veteran to leave include the lack of individual expression and celebration within the company.

For us outsiders, this post gives us an illuminating (and incriminating) look into the closed cultural ethos at Apple. Here’s a tasty snippet…

“It’s deeply ironic: For a company that famously celebrates individuality and Thinking Different, Apple has in the past decade kept its image remarkably impersonal. Other than the trinity who go onstage at press events — Steve Jobs, Jonathan Ive, Phil Schiller — how many people can you name who work for Apple? How many engineers?

It wasn’t always this way. Apple was very open in the beginning, and treated the members of the original Mac team like rock stars, complete with photo layouts in Rolling Stone. Their signatures were engraved in the inside of the computer’s case. Even in my early years there, applications’ “about boxes” proudly listed the names of the people who worked on them. The OS itself had semi-secret easter eggs that listed everyone’s name. The developer Tech Notes were bylined with the names of the individual engineers who wrote them.

Nowadays, unless you’re a vice president, the only time Apple consents to show your name is if you give a talk at the Worldwide Developers’ Conference, a rather pricey annual event.”

SOURCE: Jens Alfke |GONE INDIE

January 21, 2008

Leaders Are Rarely the Best Performers

I’m re:visiting Tom Peters’ Re:imagine! and stumbled upon this chewy management ditty on leadership…


Leaders Are Rarely the Best Performers

A symphony conductor is usually a good musician, but seldom a world-class performer. The most effective university deans are often not the best professors. The ability to lead … to Engage Others and to Turn Them On … rarely coincides with being at the tip-top of the … Individual Performance Heap.

Which is not to say that leaders shouldn’t have a fingertip familiarity with their particular line of business. But the factors that make you good at the “people stuff” and the “inspirational stuff” and the “profit-making stuff” are quite distinct from the factors that vault you to the Pinnacle of Individual Mastery.

In business, alas, it’s all too common to promote the “best” practitioner to the job of leading other practitioners. The best trainer becomes head of the training department. The best account manager becomes head of the sales department. And so on. Tellingly, that’s not how things work in … True Talent Enterprises.

So why do we go that route in business? Beats me. Gross stupidity? Maybe. But more likely: a refusal to see that leadership is … a discrete, limited, special quality.

SOURCE: Re-Imagine! (2003), pg. 321 | Tom Peters

January 19, 2008

What’s a Troubadour to Do?

Merchant

Mega-selling recording artist Natalie Merchant doesn’t have a recording contract with a major label these days. The digital download era has rendered many top-selling artists, like Ms. Merchant, unattractive and irrelevant as it relates major labels releasing newly recorded CDs.

Writing in the New York Times
, John Pareles tells us, “Ms. Merchant is back to the age-old economic model of the troubadour. People who want to hear her latest songs will have to see her perform them.”

The free market has decided it likes its recorded music more or less free and not from buying a music CD. But the free market has also decided it will pay to see a musician perform live, like Natalie Merchant. Her week-long residency at Hiro’s sold-out within hours of being announced and a sixth show was added to meet demand.

Yes, the game has changed, but has it changed as much as Natalie Merchant suggests? Only those few artists in the thick end of the long tail ever made significant money from CD sales. But those musicians in the long tail have made their money from touring and not from CD sales.

Generally speaking, a recording artist on a major label can expect to make $1.00 per CD sold. When an artist (or band) signs with a music label they are given an advance to produce a CD. Out of that advance, the artist must pay for studio time, pay the band, pay a producer, pay most marketing and promotion expenses (which includes the making of any music video), and pay for a slew of miscellaneous expenses. Most musicians exhaust their entire advance to release a major-label CD.

In order to make substantial money from a major label-issued CD, the artist needs to sell A LOT of copies. Those artists in the thick end of the long tail make money from CD sales, while those in the long tail don’t. Artists working in the long tail must tour from city-to-city and earn money from ticket sales, percentage take from drinks sales at the venue, merchandise sales, etc. Essentially, CDs (or MP3s) for long tail artists are marketing collateral pieces to get someone to buy a ticket to see them perform live. This way, the artist makes money.

Knowing all this, what's a troubadour to do?

My advice for Natalie Merchant is to not deprive her adoring fans of hearing new, recorded music. At the least, she should record live shows and sell them to her devoted fans on her website and at her live shows. She should also consider giving away her recorded music for free.

Why give away her recorded music for free? As mentioned, a CD or an MP3 file is essentially a direct mail piece to get someone to buy a concert ticket. If indeed a musician can make more money from selling tickets to a live show, shouldn’t they market themselves to sell tickets and not CDs?

Hmm … maybe that’s what a troubadour should do.

January 10, 2008

Making Customers Happy

When the 2007 year-end tallies are calculated, Amazon is expected to have grown revenues to $15 billion, an increase of 35.0% from the year prior. The company counts 72-million active customers who spent, on average, $184 on Amazon.com last year. Profit margins, which have been as low as 3.0%, have increased to 6.0%. Amazon is making money.

Amazon is also making customers happy. Ed Nocera, writing in the New York Times, thinks profit and sales-growth at Amazon is a by-product of making customers happy.

Ed purchased a PlayStation 3 as a gift from Amazon this Holiday. Concerned the package hadn’t arrived yet, Ed tracked the shipment from Amazon’s website. He learned the package had arrived and a neighbor had signed for it. Ed asked his neighbor about the package and learned she put the package in the hallway after signing for it.

Ed knew his PS3 was MIA so he managed to find Amazon’s customer service phone number and explained his situation to the customer service rep. Amazon shipped out a replacement PlayStation3 and on Christmas Day, Ed’s son was happy. And so was Ed.

Curious about Amazon’s stock performance, Ed looked it up and saw it had risen about 140% in the past year. Wall Street types credit the Amazon run-up to improved margins, international expansion, its web services business, and to increased sales with its reseller merchant market affiliates.

Ed has a different take,

I couldn’t help wondering if maybe there wasn’t something else at play here, something Wall Street never seems to take very seriously. Maybe, just maybe, taking care of customers is something worth doing when you are trying to create a lasting company. Maybe, in fact, it’s the best way to build a real business — even if it comes at the expense of short-term results.

Jeff Bezos, Amazon CEO and Founder, appeared recently on The Charlie Rose Show and had this to say about his obsession with customers,

“They [Aamzon customers] care about having the lowest prices, having vast selection, so they have choice, and getting the products to customers fast. And the reason I’m so obsessed with these drivers of the customer experience is that I believe that the success we have had over the past 12 years has been driven exclusively by that customer experience. We are not great advertisers. So we start with customers, figure out what they want, and figure out how to get it to them.”

Ed Nocera closes his article with this gem,

There is simply no question that Mr. Bezos’s obsession with his customers — and the long term — has paid off, even if he had to take some hits to the stock price along the way. Surely, it was worth it. As for me, the $500 favor the company did for me this Christmas will surely rebound in additional business down the line. Why would I ever shop anywhere else online? Then again, there may be another reason good customer service makes sense.

“Jeff used to say that if you did something good for one customer, they would tell 100 customers,” said Suresh Kotha, a management professor at the University of Washington business school.

I guess that’s what I just did.

SOURCE | Put Buyers First? What a Concept (Ed Nocera) | NY Times (Jan. 5, 2007)

December 17, 2007

Dilbert's Marketing Wisdom

Dilbert_marketing_wisdom_3

In STICK TO DRAWING COMICS MONKEY BRAIN, Dilbert creator, Scott Adams, shared the above sharp and snappy business advice on how to predict success. He continues by saying, "The only thing that predicts success is passion, even if only 10 percent of the consumers have it."

When the Dilbert comic strip first started in late 80s, Adams remembers most people didn't love it. However, about 10 percent of its readers did love it and many of them clipped-out the comic from the newspaper and shared it with their friends. These people were passionate about the humorous look at dysfunctional office life portrayed in Dilbert. They decorated their cubicles with Dilbert cartoons. Some even put together homemade books of Dilbert cartoons long before the first Dilbert book was sold. They loved Dilbert.

Scott Adams didn't worry about trying to make the Dilbert cartoon successful by making the indifferent reader passionate about Dilbert. Instead, he relied on Dilbert succeeding by fueling the passions of those most passionate about all things Dilbert.

A greater predictor of successful product introductions is to gain a passionate and loyal customer base, no matter how small in numbers they are.

This isn't an absolute predictor as the abandoned product graveyard is littered with products that failed despite attracting a small, passionate customer base. However, if your product only attracts indifferent customers and fails to attract passionate customers ... chances are, that product will not succeed.

December 07, 2007

No Photos Allowed

It’s common practice for retailers to discourage and or outright prohibit photography inside their stores. Doesn’t make it a best practice though. As Seth Godin says, “In an experience economy, where a bear workshop or furniture superstore is a form of tourism, photography is part of the deal.”

Seth smartly points out a paradox of pictures exists with retailers that deliver remarkable in-store experiences. Retailers want you to remark about your shopping experiences but not with actual pictures, only with words written and/or spoken.

My friend Conrad Hametner is a foodie. He has a passion for seeking out exotic foods with exotic names. The names get so exotic he likes to use his cellphone camera to snap photos of the foods he would never be able to remember. But recently, HE GOT CAUGHT.

While perusing the cheese section at Whole Foods Market, Conrad sampled a few cheeses and found a new favorite—Gabietou. To help him remember this cheese, he snapped a photo. But a Whole Foods Team Member (employee) sternly told him company policy says absolutely no photos are allowed to be taken in the store.

Conrad went online to find Whole Foods “No Photos” policy. Couldn’t find one. He rightfully argues that this “No Photos Allowed” policy is outdated in today’s networked world.

As a former marketer for two retailers that have helped to popularize the “experience economy,” I understand the irony that exists with creating a store experience customers want to photograph but then, prohibiting it.

Why do retailers prohibit/discourage customers from taking photos? Two major reasons: Competitive Intent and Criminal Intent.

Competitive Intent
When Starbucks began its hyper-growth spurt in the early 90s, they had more than just customers in their stores—they also had curious businesspeople. The businesspeople would come huddled in small groups and everyone in the group would be clutching a pen and a pad. They would stay for hours noting everything from the store décor to menu boards to employee uniforms to operational procedures to customer counts to everything. They also took photos.

Starbucks policy prohibited photos because they didn’t want competitors mimicking their style. (As if a “no photos policy” was really going to stop competitors from learning how to replicate the Starbucks experience.) Today places like Whole Foods Market, Chipotle, Urban Outfitters, Cereality, Which Wich, and American Apparel are attracting curious businesspeople wanting to learn what they do that makes them worth mimicking.

This “No Photos Allowed” policy is still in place at Starbucks but not for the original reasons of dissuading copycat competitors.

Criminal Intent
Another major reason why Starbucks and other retailers prohibit customers from taking pictures is to protect them from the unsavory types casing the joint. Theft for any retail business is a big issue and having front-line employees on the lookout for people snapping photos could help to reduce theft.

However, it can get silly and seemingly ridiculous when retailers confront well-meaning customers (like Conrad) from taking photos. It happens a lot … like here, here, and here. I especially love the irony of the Apple store that told an in-store customer he wasn’t allowed to take a photo using his iPhone.

As Seth said … customers taking photos is part of the deal when you deliver remarkable customer experiences. So its about time for retailers to learn this lesson and solve for dissuading potential thieves with policies and activities other than prohibiting customers from taking photos.

November 13, 2007

Chewy Marketing Quote

Peterdruckermarketingquote_2

November 02, 2007

Another Chewy Management Quote

Earlier I shared a chewy management quote from John Teets, CEO at Viad. Today, we hear from Stanford Prof. Jeffrey Pfeffer ...

"A leader's job is to reduce uncertainty, not create it."
SOURCE: WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? (Jeffrey Pfeffer)

November 01, 2007

What Were They Thinking? (Jeffrey Pfeffer)

Long-time readers of this blog know I have an affinity for business books. Okay. Affinity is too loose a word. ADDICTION is more appropriate.

{Hi. I’m John Moore and I’m addicted to business books.}

Just because I’m addicted to business books doesn’t mean I enjoy every biz book I read. Too often I slog through lousy biz books hoping to mine a few knowledge nuggets. Unfortunately, most biz books fail to help me generate new ideas, nor do they give me a new perspective on a business topic. So when a business book comes along that delivers smart ideas and unique perspective, I get excited.

Jeffrey Pfeffer’s WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? – Unconventional Wisdom about Management has me excited. It’s a fast-paced book that’s laced with knowledge nuggets making me a smarter business thinker and doer.

Here are some of the knowledge nuggets Pfeffer shares that has this marketer thinking …


WHAT?: Get Smarter by Taking Small Risks

SO WHAT?: “Companies are a lot like children—none are born knowing all they need to know, and relatively few are born smart. Most acquire intelligence by learning basic tasks and skills, mastering them, and then moving on to learn more tasks.” (p. 32)

“Relatively few companies actually embrace the management practices that are required to help them get smarter (p. 33). Learning and innovation also require letting people make mistakes.” (p. 36)

“The irony is that even as companies want to become learning organizations, they don’t want to be places where people can learn new things—because that requires putting people in positions where they do tasks they don’t do very well.” (p. 36)

WHAT NOW?: “The principle is simple—learn and fail on a small scale. But that ethos requires accepting that novelty and innovation are invariably accompanied by setbacks and failures. And embracing such a way of operating requires letting people fail—maybe even encouraging them to fail.” (p. 37)


WHAT?: Working Longer Hours is a Fallacy

SO WHAT?: “Companies often make long hours sort of a loyalty test. Employees are expected to put their work and their employer first, and one way of demonstrating their commitment is by forgoing leisure and family.” (p. 69)

“Contrary to myth and much conventional wisdom, European companies can and do compete successfully in global product and service markets, even with vacation and workweek policies that put their U.S. competitors to shame.” (p. 71)

WHAT NOW?: “It’s time for the U.S. companies that have made late nights and short weekends a test of loyalty to come to terms with the myth that long hours and no vacations are good for the bottom line.” (p. 73)


WHAT?: We Overemphasize Strategy

SO WHAT?: “There I sat at yet another board meeting, listening to the chief executive drone on about sales strategy and product strategy as he pointed to slick slideware filled with analyses of potential markets and buzzwords about our competitive positioning in the design visualization software market.

Then it dawned on me—almost no one in the room, including the person talking, had actually visited a customer or, for that matter, even used the company’s product in their own work.” (p. 166)

WHAT NOW? “Instead of sitting in meetings and spending time preparing fancy PowerPoint presentations, develop your strategy adaptively, by using your company’s best thinking at the time, learning from experience, and then trying again, using what you have learned. Under almost all circumstances, fast learners are going to outperform even the most brilliant strategists who can’t adapt.” (p. 170)


Worthwhile stuff!

WHAT NOW? Well ... stop reading this and start reading Jeffrey Pfeffer’s WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?

October 08, 2007

Simple Advice for Better Presentations

While riffling through Carmine Gallo's just-published book, FIRE THEM UP, I landed upon some super-smart advice for delivering a more effective presentation. Gallo writes ...

A client once asked me, "How can I be more like Steve Job in my next presentation?"

"It's simple," I explained. "Tell your listeners why you're excited about your product, share a vivid vision of the future that your product makes possible, and be specific about how your product will help them succeed in business."

Most people hype features. Steve Jobs sells benefits. When he pitches products, it's not about him: it's about you. That is the secret behind a master showman.

Great advice.

October 06, 2007

The Rhetoric and Reality of Management

Futureofmanagement3_3

THE FUTURE OF MANAGEMENT
from Gary Hamel is a must-read for all us businesspeople.

Gary, along with the wordsmithing help of Bill Breen, writes that management innovation lags far behind the significant innovation we’ve experienced in business with product development and business model development. He presents an argument explaining how outdated management practices, and not operating or business models, is the true culprit for why businesses fail to perform.

On page 35, Hamel writes … “Today, every CEO claims to be a champion of innovation—so why the barn-sized blind spot when it comes to management innovation?” In other words, there is a gap between the rhetoric and reality of management.

Interesting premise, eh?

Hamel is a proponent of management models which empower employees to be creative, be given room to experiment with new ideas, be rewarded for successes, and be held accountable for driving the business. Whole Foods Market, W.L. Gore, and Google are highlighted in the book as businesses practicing innovative management systems.

These case study companies Hamel highlights all have developed a corporate culture where bottom-up employee-driven innovation helps to fuel the success of the business. Unfortunately, businesses have failed to develop a company culture where every employee is given an opportunity to truly impact the business.

Hamel suggests there are three obstacles for why businesses fail in creating a management culture that is innovative, evolving, and ever-effective:


#1 | Too Much Management, Too Little Freedom
“Anyone who has ever run a university, a film studio, or an open-source software project will tell you that getting the most out of people seldom means managing them more, and usually means managing them less. It means giving fewer orders, worrying less about alignment, and spending less time checking up on folks.”

#2 | Too Much Hierarchy, Too Little Community
“Hierarchies are very good at aggregating effort, at coordinating the activities of many people with widely varying roles. But they’re not very good at mobilizing effort, at inspiring people to go above and beyond.”

#3 | Too Much Exhortation, Too Little Purpose
"A moral imperative can’t be manufactured by speech writers or ginned up by consultants. It can’t be cobbled together in a two-day off-site. Rather, it must grow out of some genuine sense of mission, possibility, or outrage. A moral imperative is not something one invents to wring more out of people. To be regarded as authentic, it must be an end, not a means.”


If you enjoy chewy business fodder, I recommend reading Gary Hamel’s THE FUTURE OF MANAGEMENT. This book will probably go down as my vote for the smartest business strategy book of 2007.

October 01, 2007

Chewy Management Quote

John Teets, former Greyhound Corp. chairman and current CEO at Viad once said ...

"Management's job is to see the company not as it is ... but as it can become."
[source of quote]

September 28, 2007

Bill Gammell on Seinfeld Marketing Lessons

Could it be everything Bill Gammell learned about marketing, he learned from watching Seinfeld? Maybe not everything ... but he did learn some smart marketing lessons from Jerry, Elaine, George, Kramer, and the Cougar 9000.

Consider Bill's e-book worthwhile (and fun) weekend reading.

Bill_gammell_seinfeld
Click image above ... (go ahead, do it.)

September 25, 2007

QVC and EGM

Yeah I know ... lots of chatter about Employee-Generated Media (EGM) on the blog recently. There just happens to be a rash of instances lately. Here'€™s another interesting example from QVC. (Yes, the home shopping channel.)

QVC recently launched an ad campaign centered around trying to own the letter "Q."


[SIDEBAR: I always smirk when I hear us marketers make such grandiose statements like we are going to own the letter "€œQ."€ At Starbucks we used to focus some of our marketing efforts to "€œOwn Coffee." I always had to bite my lip whenever I would say something like, "This re-introduced coffee passport program will help enable us to "'˜own coffee.'"€ Starbucks doesn'€™t own coffee. Never has. Never will. Coffee isn'€™t ownable by anyone.]
Back to the post ...

Qvc_new_logo_2QVC is putting a lot of energy behind their customer-facing campaign to own the letter "Q" ... a new, bolder logo ... lots of stylish billboards ... an overhauled website. All this activity is focusing on the QUALITY aspect of hyping the QVC experience of Quality, Value, and Convenience.

Turns out this focus on owning the letter Q began as an internal marketing initiative in June 2006. All 13,000 QVC employees were given a logo t-shirt and given the challenge of getting the most spectacular product placement. The winning employee would get $10,000.

I'€™m not a fan of doing gimmicky stunts to capture customer attention. As a marketer, I much prefer to garner customer intention more than capture customer attention.

However, this Product Placement employee contest from QVC is a fun idea to tap into the creativity and ingenuity of employees. According to the New York Times, one QVC t-shirt wearing employee had their picture taken with Donovan McNabb, Philadelphia Eagles quarterback, and that picture found its way on the Eagle'€™s website.

QVC employee Peter Fey, brother of writer/actress Tina Fey, had his famous sister plug the t-shirt and QVC during an appearance on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. (Watch the Tina Fey/QVC video clip here.)

The winning QVC t-shirt product placement came from an employee who organized a belly flop contest for an autism charity. Each contestant wore the QVC t-shirt and a local TV station did a live stand-up from the event.

Fun stuff. I hope more companies entrust and encourage their employees to do similar things.


SOURCE: New York Times article | Sept. 21

September 23, 2007

the Deloitte Film Fest

In an earlier post on "Employee-Generated Media," I referenced an article from the Wall Street Journal explaining some accounting firms have encouraged its employees to make short videos about their on-the-job experiences. These videos are being used as recruiting tools to attract talented college kids.

Deloitte & Touche ran a contest with its employees to create videos answering the question, "What's your Deloitte?" They received over 400 submissions from employees and have posted 14 videos on a Deloitte Film Fest YouTube page.

Kudos to Deliotte! There's a lesson in all this for other businesses to follow. The lesson being ... Be good to your people and your people will be good to you.

Watch these amazing Deloitte employee-generated videos showcasing the creativity, passion, and thoughtfulness that Deloitte has inspired within its employees.

Yeah, it's easy to get cynical about this stuff. However, I urge you to look beyond the super-rosy depictions and think what would happen if your company encouraged its employees to do something similar. Would the depiction be rosy or thorny?

>> Thanks to Marc Bresseel for the video hook-up.
>> RSS Readers ... click here to watch ALL the videos on YouTube.


Deloitte and You

The Green Dot

Iron Man

September 21, 2007

Dell and Social Media

Last night at the Austin Social Media Club event, we learned about Dell’s forays into “social media” from John Pope, Lionel Menchcha, and Caroline Dietz. (John, Lionel and Caroline are responsible for managing Dell’s social media initiatives.)

During this 90-minute panel discussion, they shared how Dell is using their Direct2Dell blog and their IdeaStorm project to become a better, more responsive, and more likeable company. (Great stuff.)

Below are some highlights from the very interesting panel discussion …


re: Dell’s Social Media Goals
1 | Enter into conversations with customers everyday in every major language
2 | Address any form of customer dissatisfaction head-on knowing that not everything will be solved and some of Dell’s weaknesses will be exposed
4 | Encourage "crowd sourcing" as the next step in listening to customers
5 | Use video to personalize the Dell story
[John Pope, digital media senior manager]
re: Dell’s Beginning Blogging Efforts
Contrary to perception, Dell didn’t start blogging because of Jeff Jarvis. However, Jeff’s rants did help Dell realize there were customer service issues the company needed to address.

In April of 2006, Michael Dell charged Dell to proactively find dissatisfied customers in the blogosphere and connect them with someone at Dell who could help them. By July, Dell had launched its blogging efforts.

Dell stumbled with the initial launch of their Direct2Dell blog. They listened to feedback on how to improve it, namely adding links in posts linking to other bloggers. Dell adjusted and in some cases apologized for making a mistake.
[Lionel Menchaca, digital media manager]


re: Changing the Tone of the Conversation about Dell
At the low point in 2006, Dell calculated at least 50% of the online conversation about Dell was negative. Today, Dell calculates the negative online conversation percentage number has been reduced to 23%. Dell doesn’t attribute all its blogging efforts to stemming the negative online conversation, but they are confident that blogging has helped.
[Lionel Menchaca]
re: “Wins” in the Blogosphere
90% of the time Dell enters into a conversation, it “wins.” A “win” happens when (a) you enter the conversation and just thank someone for giving their opinion and (b) when you weigh-in on a negative thread with clarification of facts and the negativity subsides.
[John Pope]
re: Dell’s Process for Posting on the Direct2Dell blog
Lionel serves as “editor-in-chief” for the Direct2Dell blog. As the editor-in-chief, Lionel balances three areas when it comes to topics the company chooses to blog about:
(1) content/ideas from Dell’s cadre of bloggers
(2) comments from Direct2Dell readers … if a topic emerges from readers, then Dell knows it needs to blog about that topic
(3) the need to add Dell’s voice to an online conversation that directly or indirectly impacts Dell.
[Lionel Menchaca]
re: Moderating Comments
Dell moderates comments on the Direct2Dell blog. On busy weeks, Dell receives up to 400 comments. Well over 90% of those comments get posted following a quick look-see. Dell uses common sense guidelines when deciding which comments to moderate. Dell’s three common sense rules are:
(1) No profanity
(2) No direct attacks on Direct2Dell readers
(3) Anything addressing legal issues are not posted,
[Lionel Menchaca]
re: IdeaStorm
The Direct2Dell blog changed how the company viewed online customer conversations. In the past, Dell wasn’t comfortable with participating or reacting to the conversations happening online about the company. However, the company now understands the importance of participating and reacting to the online conversation … so much so that … directly soliciting ideas from the online community was the next step in Dell’s social media strategy.

In Febuary 2007, Dell launched IdeaStorm — which is, simplistically speaking, an “online suggestion box” inviting people to offer ideas on how Dell can improve its products and services.

One unique aspect to IdeaStorm is Dell is now able to close the loop with feedback from customers. When customers post ideas on IdeaStorm, Dell is able to follow-up with posts/comments explaining that the company heard them and explain what Dell is doing in response.

Dell views IdeaStorm as a way its product development team can co-create products with customers. Pre-installed Linux on Dell computers was one of the first ideas generated from IdeaStorm that Dell product developers worked with customers to co-create and introduce to the marketplace.

There are about 35 other ideas Dell has put into action as a response to listening to feedback from customers on IdeaStorm.
[Caroline Dietz, online community manager for IdeaStorm]


re: Lessons Dell is Learning from IdeaStorm
While there have been many successes with IdeaStorm, Dell is still adapting to how this initiative is changing the culture at the company. Being more transparent and sharing company information isn’t a cornerstone of the Dell corporate culture. However, IdeaStorm requires a certain comfort level with being open and forthcoming that Dell employees are adjusting to. Clearly, Dell’s participation in the online social media world is having an impact on its company culture.
[Caroline Dietz]
re: Dell EmployeeStorm
As a result of the success IdeaStorm has had in generating ideas from customers, Dell has launched EmployeeStorm to generate ideas and comments from its 88,000 employees. A by-product has been employees are learning to become more comfortable sharing ideas and adding comments that they are now more willing to participate in IdeaStorm.
[Caroline Dietz]

September 19, 2007

More EGM (Employee-Generated Media)

In the preceding post I mentioned how accounting firms are using Employee-Generated Media (EGM) in the form of short videos to help recruit new employees.

How about this instance of EGM … the just-published HOW STARBUCKS SAVED MY LIFE.

Howstarbuckssavedmylife

Michael Gates Gill, a former ad-exec, dropped out of the corporate rat race and found happiness while working a $10.50/hr job as a Starbucks Barista. Michael chronicles his self-discovery story in HOW STARBUCKS SAVED MY LIFE. (Read an excerpt here.)

It’ll be interesting to see how (or if) Starbucks embraces this book as an act of “employee-generated media.” Having a book on the market extolling the virtues and values of a company treating its employees well can only help in the recruitment of new employees.

On a side-note … Gill’s Starbucks story is remarkable, but not isolated. There are numerous stories of corporate refugees finding solace as a Starbucks Barista. I recall one such corporate refugee parlaying her Starbucks Barista job into being a Starbucks Zone Marketing Director.


Learn more about Michael's story:
>> USA TODAY article
>> NY Times article
>> WSJ Journal review
>> Reveries article

EGM Anyone?

The marketing world is learning to become more comfortable with CGM (consumer generated media) and with Citizen Marketers. Now we also must learn to become more comfortable with EGM -- Employee Generated Media.

The Wall Street Journal reports
the Big Four accounting firms are using "Employee Generated Media" to help gain an edge in the ever-competitive campus recruiting scene. Josee Rose writes ...

"To lure candidates steeped in Facebook and YouTube, the Big Four are turning to the Web. Deloitte & Touche asked employees to make short videos about their experiences at the company. The videos were a way 'of taking the aspects of social networking and experimenting on how you can use the new tools of today to move forward into a workplace of the future,' said Cathy Benko, chief talent officer. About 400 videos were made, and the 14 best will be posted on YouTube and used on campuses.[source]

Is it a scary for you to consider having employees make short videos about the experiences at your company? Are you afraid of what they will say? Are you afraid they will be off-message and off-brand? If so, sounds like you have some work that must be done to improve the employee experience at your company.

September 11, 2007

Kevin Carroll quote

Kevin Carroll is a dynamic speaker, inspiring author, and social change agent. At the In-HOWse Designer Conference (Austin, TX), Kevin closed the three-day affair with a playful presentation that included this money quote ...

Kevincarroll_howconference

September 10, 2007

Conducting a Marketing Physical to Ensure Brand Health


NOTE: The post is meant more for attendees of the In-HOWse Designer Conference (Austin, TX).
On Monday, I delivered a presentation titled, Conducting a Marketing Physical To Ensure Brand Health.

The following is the presentation description that appeared in the Conference materials ...

It's time to give your business a marketing physical. This may sound strange, but it's just like going to your own doctor and getting a physical for yourself. The doc takes your vital signs, asks probing questions, and conducts a few key exams. You learn what may be affecting your health, and then you adjust your day-to-day life based on the results in an effort to ward off serious illnesses.

Why not do the same for your brand or business?

John Moore shows you how to conduct your marketing physical to diagnose and treat common marketing ailments like anemic sales, poor brand complexion and marketing obesity.


To view the slides, simply click the forward button below:


RSS Readers ... click here to view the presentation.

September 09, 2007

Why is Everyone Smiling

"Call centers are traditionally commodity businesses with very low margins, high turnover, and low morale. We're the complete opposite. We have profits that are four to five times higher than other call center companies. And we have a fraction of the normal attrition."
Paul Speigelman | CEO, co-founder of Beryl

Beryl operates call centers for hospital and health care providers. So when you call a hospital in the middle of the night, chances are you’ll be talking to a nurse at a call center and maybe a nurse from Beryl. This not a glamorous business but it is a necessary business.

As Paul says in the above quote, call centers are a commodity business where pay is low and turnover is high. Yet Beryl has managed to grow with zest and zeal that belies the fact it is a commodified business. Beryl has grown to become a $25-million dollar with over 300 employees.

Since it competes in a margin-challenged industry, Beryl can’t afford to pay its employees more than its competitors. According to a Dallas Morning News article, a new Beryl call center employee makes no more than $22k. An experienced Beryl call center employee may make as much as $35k.

In the same article, Paul explains instead of paying employees more per hour, Beryl spends “hundreds of thousands of dollars a year” to make the workplace more fun and enjoyable. They throw parties for employees, take field trips during the day, conduct a murder mystery game that has employees spending weeks solving whodunit.

And Paul, the CEO, finds new ways to humiliate himself in front of employees. At one company party he might be dressed up as a matador roller skating around the gala. Or he could take on all comers in a game of one-on-one basketball during the NCAA March Madness Tournament.

You can learn all about Paul’s management philosophy and business beliefs in his recently published book, WHY IS EVERYONE SMILING? Bo Burlingham, of "Small Giants" fame, wrote the foreword to the book and he gushes about the special company culture at Beryl.

One of Paul’s key management practices is “Employees should always expect fun just around the corner.” Below are ten practices Paul believes can ensure that fun is just around the corner for employees. You’d be wise to read them and act upon them. (You’d also be wise to read Paul’s book.) Enjoy…

Picture_5_2
WAYS TO MAKE EMPLOYEES SMILE
Paul Speigelman | CEO, co-founder of Beryl

Give Employees a Voice
We have the Better Beryl Bureau, a group of 15 co-workers from all facets of the organization responsible for enhancing our culture.

Pay them Fairly
Money is not the only source of motivation, but the lack of a fair pay structure can quickly lead to dissension.

Recognize and Reward
Leaders must personally let people know that they appreciate them. Peer-to-peer recognition is equally valuable. We encourage peer recognition certificates and hold quarterly drawings for winners who receive cash prizes.

Offer Opportunities for Advancement
Look first within the ranks when a position becomes available. Provide opportunities for training and mentoring to help people grow personally and professionally.

Support Out-of-the-Box Semantics
Our HR department is the ‘Department of Great People and Fun, and its director is the ‘Queen of Fun and Laughter.’”

Infiltrate the Workplace with Fun
Look for opportunities to celebrate and make them festive.

Walk the Walk
If you're having a down day, don't let it show. If you can't disguise your feelings, stay home. Just as laughter is contagious, so is a frown.

Send a Handwritten Note
It's even more appreciated today than it was two decades ago.

Let Down your Guard.
Don't be afraid to sit in the dunk tank during a family picnic or don a costume in a celebration.

Open your Heart
We have created a formal program so that co-workers can inform us about events in their lives or the lives of their peers, and we find appropriate ways to be there for them when they need us.

SOURCE: Dallas Morning News article | Sept. 4, 2007

September 06, 2007

a Must Read Manifesto

I’m tired of slogging through business books hoping that somewhere within the far too repetitive pages I’ll find a few money quotes. I continue to believe most 250-page business books can be slimmed down to a svelte 25-pages without losing much. That’s why I'm a big fan of ChangeThis.

Since 2004, ChangeThis has been making me a smarter marketer through its trove of quick-read manifestos. ChangeThis is chock-full of pamphlet-sized business books with just enough information and just enough inspiration to help me make things happen at work.

The latest manifesto I’m high on is THE SECRETS OF MARKET-DRIVEN LEADERS. In 16-pages, Craig Stull, Phil Myers, and David Meerman Scott share practical advice on how businesses can be more successful by being market-driven rather than being just customer-driven, competitor-driven, or sales-driven.

It’s a smart read with lots of money quotes. For example, here is a cut ‘n paste snippet from the 7 Secrets of Market-Driven Leaders section of their manifesto. Enjoy...

7 Secrets of Market-Driven Leaders

S