[I'm on a visual kick these days.]
Let your marketing mind wrestle with David Armano's nifty depiction of the ladder up to Brand Heaven and the ladder down to Brand Hell. Good Stuff!

[I'm on a visual kick these days.]
Let your marketing mind wrestle with David Armano's nifty depiction of the ladder up to Brand Heaven and the ladder down to Brand Hell. Good Stuff!

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf89d53ef00e552b9d5fc8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Up the Ladder OR Down the Ladder?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
At what level does profit come into play? If you are making money consistently at "negative interactions", wouldn't that be considered a strong brand?
My point being, any level, in heaven or hell, that produces a consistent profit should be considered a strong brand - or at least the stakeholders would think so.
Posted by: Kenyatta | June 04, 2008 at 07:12 AM
Good question, but how long will the / could the profits last at a "negative interaction?"
I feel as though the company I work for is in Hell (maybe at negative interactions), but we've been surviving for 5 years now. The question is, how can I convince the stakeholders that we won't survive much longer if we keep walking down the steps deeper into the hot zone even if we keep seeing a marginal profit?
Posted by: Jill | June 04, 2008 at 11:58 AM
Great graphic. Personally, I'd put consistency before trust, just because I never trust one-hit wonders. I'd also characterize the attutide toward the bottom-dwellers of hell as outward, proactive aversion. "I'll get the dirty &%#%*s ...."
Posted by: Jim Bender | June 05, 2008 at 09:48 AM
Love the graphic - wonder what all this activity of companies launching communities will have on where they sit on the ladder?
More here.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/685e3x
TO'B
Posted by: Tom O'Brien | June 05, 2008 at 03:35 PM
I'd add evangelism to the top of heaven and terrorism or sabotage to the bottom of hell. Your best customers and most displeased former customers are seldom so passive to be merely "loyal" or "disloyal." They're either out there selling on your behalf or very actively preventing sales.
Posted by: Tracy | June 09, 2008 at 01:02 AM
I second Tracy's comment. Looks like a couple of steps are missing.
Posted by: Restaurant Commando | July 06, 2008 at 10:53 PM